[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15878700#comment-15878700
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1635:
-------------------------------------------

Github user davebshow commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/561
  
    Yeah it looks fine to me. It seems that properties are serialized before 
the element dict is "cleaned up". I don't see why you would serialize it again. 
However, I haven't really familiarized myself with the new GraphSON work on 
master yet. Still, I see no reason why we can't merge this. If the code is 
refactored and it is no longer relevant, so be it.


> gremlin-python: Duplicate serialization of element property in 
> PropertySerializer
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1635
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1635
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: language-variant
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> The {{PropertySerializer}} in the current master branch of gremlin-python 
> serializes the element property twice:
> {code}
> elementDict = writer.toDict(property.element)
> #...
> "element": writer.toDict(elementDict)
> {code}
> This isn't a problem when the element only contains simple types like strings 
> that aren't serialized by adding a type attribute (like in the unit test for 
> this component). However, all other types like integers for example are 
> serialized two times. So an integer will be serialized to:
> {code}
> {"@type":"g:Int32","@value":{"@type":"g:Int32","@value":1}}
> {code}
> Full example:
> {code}
> >>> p = Property("aKey","aValue", Edge(123, Vertex(1), "edgeLabel", 
> >>> Vertex(2)))
> >>> writer.writeObject(p)
> '{"@type":"g:Property","@value":{"value":"aValue","key":"aKey","element":{"@type":"g:Edge","@value":{"inV":{"@type":"g:Int32","@value":{"@type":"g:Int32","@value":2}},"id":{"@type":"g:Int32","@value":{"@type":"g:Int32","@value":123}},"outV":{"@type":"g:Int32","@value":{"@type":"g:Int32","@value":1}},"label":"edgeLabel"}}}}'
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to