[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15962310#comment-15962310
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1552:
-------------------------------------------
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/600
I saw your development branch in the works and was wondering how close you
were to getting it ready to actually submit it. I guess it was closer than I
thought. :) Just to make sure expectations are set right, it may take some time
to get this reviewed and some iterations of reviews/fixes before we can really
vote on it.
One thing I'm worried about is that we don't have our GLV test framework
really worked out well yet. I was hoping to get to that early in this year, but
other priorities have drawn me away from that.
In any case, thanks for doing this. Very nice to see support for a language
that really doesn't work on the JVM at all, i.e. no ScriptEngine support (that
I know of). I sense that will produce a whole host of new concerns to GLVs that
we will need to sort out. I'll have to dust off my .NET knowledge - it's been
a while since I've done anything with that. :smile:
> C# Gremlin Language Variant
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: language-variant
> Affects Versions: 3.2.3
> Reporter: Jorge Bay
>
> It would be nice to have a C# GLV that runs under .NET Framework 4.5+ and
> .NET Core.
> The maven build could use the Exec Maven Plugin to exec .NET Core's [dotnet
> test|https://www.microsoft.com/net/core#macos] command.
> Some requirements, from the mailing list (edited):
> {quote}
> 1. The GLV should keep in line with class/method names of the java API
> where possible to ensure consistency of feel across languages.
> 2. There needs to be adequate tests (we're still discussing the approach to
> testing GLVs and i think that needs to be tackled sooner than later as more
> GLVs start to come in). Those tests should produce xunit style output
> unless there is some good reason not to.
> 3. There needs to be adequate documentation (e.g. Reference docs)
> 4. The build/deploy process needs to be bound to maven which might be one of
> the trickier bits to deal with.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
