Note that the CosmosDB crew has updated their documentation to address branding concerns. Looks good.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > I've had some contact with the CosmosDB devs and mentioned the issues with > the docs + branding. They are fine to make changes. I've submitted a PR > with some initial stuff: > > https://github.com/Microsoft/azure-docs/pull/1751 > > which should deal with the branding concerns. If anyone sees other > improvements that could be made it might be worthwhile to issue a PR > because those docs are good exposure for TinkerPop and Gremlin. > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I modified the github description of the old TinkerPop projects to be >> suffixed with: >> >> > (no longer active - see Apache TinkerPop) >> >> and then changed the website link to http://tinkerpop.apache.org. I also >> updated the READMEs to fix some links. Hopefully, that does the trick, but >> we'll see......... >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> > I think we have a bit of a branding issue though. >>> >>> Any Microsoft folks on the dev list whom we can talk to about that? >>> >>> If we get crickets, I think some of their docs are in github - maybe >>> someone could submit some PRs for more "Apache TinkerPop" and appropriate >>> links. As for: >>> >>> > * redirect http://gremlin.tinkerpop.com to http://tinkerpop.apache.org >>> /gremlin.html >>> >>> maybe it's time to break that old link to TinkerPop 2 for >>> gremlin.tinkerpop.com. i'd rather that people find the right stuff and >>> somehow they still seem to fail at it. I loved this answer from Mr Plurad >>> on SO: >>> >>> http://stackoverflow.com/a/43590090/1831717 >>> >>> filled the entire page with the "cancelled gremlin" :) >>> >>> > * update the text description and URL to make Apache TinkerPop more >>> > prominent >>> on https://github.com/tinkerpop/gremlin >>> >>> I can update that - ideas on what should we put in there? maybe all >>> descriptions should be updated? >>> >>> > You can use robots.txt to decrease ranking and/or drop the page out >>> of the index altogether over time >>> >>> Taken from that same page it would be nice if we could do: "use the >>> noindex robots meta tag or X-Robots-Tag HTTP header" on old pages. anyone >>> know how to update our scripts to have a >>> >>> bin/publish-docs.sh --retire 3.2.3 >>> >>> that would just do that automatically? is that hard? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Misha Brukman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > I'm +1 on adding CosmoDB. >>>> > >>>> > I think we have a bit of a branding issue though. Most of their docs >>>> talk >>>> > about the Gremlin graph language, and they generally fail to mention >>>> > "Apache TinkerPop", which perhaps makes sense if they're not directly >>>> > implementing TinkerPop's Java APIs. I don't think "Apache Gremlin" was >>>> > trademarked by the ASF? >>>> > >>>> > Google still isn't helping either since many of the top links refer to >>>> > TinkerPop 2 items (which do have the deprecated warning). A couple >>>> ideas >>>> > based on the top search results: >>>> > * redirect http://gremlin.tinkerpop.com to >>>> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/gremlin.html >>>> > * update the text description and URL to make Apache TinkerPop more >>>> > prominent on https://github.com/tinkerpop/gremlin >>>> >>>> >>>> You can use robots.txt to decrease ranking and/or drop the page out of >>>> the >>>> index altogether over time (incoming links may prevent immediate drop >>>> out >>>> of the index): >>>> >>>> - >>>> https://developers.google.com/webmasters/control-crawl-inde >>>> x/docs/faq#h17 >>>> - https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6062608?hl=en >>>> >>>> Misha >>>> >>> >>> >> >
