I didn't belittle other projects. Saying a project is less mature or popular is not "belittling" them. Than you for the info.
On Oct 1, 2017 8:00 AM, "Stephen Mallette" <[email protected]> wrote: The Community Contributions listing is not a popularity contest. You don't need to prove how great Ferma is and you certainly don't need to belittle the efforts of other TinkerPop community members who have also contributed OGMs. To get listed you simply need to meet our listing policy which is spelled out here: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html If you do, you send an email along the lines of: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f1136cb44c634233a73627c23d73d1 8d0ed0c464bb3cf60af5dc8405@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E The community will take some time to consider the proposal and then in all likelihood it will be added - I don't think we've ever denied a request and if we did, the problem was quickly rectified by the project owner and the project got the listing addition. Please make sure Ferma complies with the listing policy and start a fresh dev list thread for discussion. On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Jeffrey Freeman < [email protected]> wrote: > I was looking at the "Community Contributions" section of > http://tinkerpop.apache.org > > I noticed of all the OGM (Object Graph Model) Libraries listed all the ones > there are less mature, less active, and have less users than the more > popular Ferma library ( https://github.com/Syncleus/Ferma ). Why was this > left out, it has been around for almost 4 years now (older than most of the > options on the list). > > Fair warning I am the author of Ferma, but you can check the project > history to confirm most of my assertions. Seems it deserves mention in the > list. >
