One question. In some places i reference the specific version as "Tinkerpop3" can those references remain as-is, if they are to be reworded whats the proper format for those?
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Jeffrey Freeman < jeffrey.free...@syncleus.com> wrote: > Happy to make those changed. If I understand you correct the issue is just > with naming "Tinkerpop" to "Apache TinkerPop™" to make the trademark more > clear? I'm happy to do that, assuming markdown can support the tm mark, if > not ill add it as (tm). > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 from me - pending some fixes in initial references to "TinkerPop" in >> Ferma README and web site/docs to become "Apache TinkerPop™". Other than >> that it looks good to me. >> >> We'll give this 72 hours to see if anyone else has comments - assuming no >> objections we can get Ferma into the listing after that. Thanks for your >> continued contribution in this area. >> >> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Jeffrey Freeman < >> jeffrey.free...@syncleus.com> wrote: >> >> > Ferma should be listed in the "Community Contributions" section of the >> main >> > tinkerpop3 apache site ( http://tinkerpop.apache.org ) >> > >> > Their project/github link: https://github.com/Syncleus/Ferma >> > Their website and documentation: http://syncleus.com/Ferma >> > >> > They meet all requirements in the policy document ( >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html ) including full support for >> > Tinkerpop3, their own website, many releases, and documentation. >> > >> > I've also created the following ticket to help speed this along: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1794 >> > >> > (FYI I know i sent a similar email earlier, this new e-mail is in a >> format >> > as suggested from a member of the community in that thread) >> > >> > >
