[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16226846#comment-16226846
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1821:
-------------------------------------------
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/739
```
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 04:38 h
[INFO] Finished at: 2017-10-30T20:11:57-06:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 170M/1547M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
```
> Consistent behavior of self-referencing edges
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1821
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1821
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.2.6
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
>
> Given discussions here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/adcfa13130026896da215be257fd26b309820c1cd5b5d359ed9cdfa2@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E
> we needed to include a test to ensure consistency of the traversal behavior
> around self-referencing edges in relation to
> {code}
> g.V().bothE()
> g.V().both()
> {code}
> The expected behavior is already present in TinkerGraph and that expected
> behavior is as follows:
> {code}
> gremlin> g.addV().as("a").addE("self").to("a").iterate()
> gremlin> g.V().bothE()
> ==>e[19][18-self->18]
> ==>e[19][18-self->18]
> gremlin> g.V().both()
> ==>v[18]
> ==>v[18]
> {code}
> This may break a number of providers as we've not had a test for this
> behavior until now - we should provide some upgrade documentation to call
> attention to this issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
