Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/748
  
    In reviewing this, I think Gremlin Server needs a change. When we submit a 
remote traversal. Gremlin Server needs to check for `iterate()` in the bytecode 
and actually call `iterate()` rather than `next()` that way the graph instance 
gets the right method called on it for any additional optimization that could 
occur there. Plus, if the client did call `iterate()` it's better that Gremlin 
Server simply return no results - that's a big optimization. I can work on that 
change and just commit it to this branch as part of this PR.


---

Reply via email to