[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16400114#comment-16400114
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1854:
-------------------------------------------
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/792
I would prefer a generic `ILambda` for string based lambdas (groovy and
python) but I don't have an strong opinion about it.
> Support lambdas in Gremlin.Net
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1854
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1854
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dotnet
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0, 3.2.6
> Reporter: Florian Hockmann
> Assignee: Florian Hockmann
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.2.8, 3.3.2
>
>
> Gremlin.Net should support lambdas. We already discussed this in [the pull
> request for TINKERPOP-1752|https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/712].
> Here is what [~spmallette] said over there:
> {quote}
> Any reason we don't support lambdas? Even if .NET can't support them natively
> for some reason wouldn't we minimally support the ability to pass a
> python/groovy/etc lambda? it's kinda weird that way, but i think back to the
> point that kuppitz made on the dev list the other day where he stated that he
> doesn't always find a way out of using lambdas in production systems he works
> on - so ultimately users will need that kind of capability i think.
> {quote}
> C# lambdas would require some kind of C# parser on the server side, so at
> least in the beginning a way to send lambdas from already supported languages
> in Gremlin.Net should be enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
