Yea, that's weird. My code was actually pseudo-code, I wasn't referring to T.id and T.label, we would have String some constants as we do for other with() modulations. Perhaps:
valueMap().with(Tokens.all) valueMap().with(Tokens.label) valueMap().with(Tokens.id) Cheers, Daniel On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:14 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought about using with() for this in some way but figured by() was the > right direction. i like your idea, but with(String) won't take with(label) > or with(id) right? can we use by() again? We already have by(T) as a > modulator: > > g.V(). > valueMap(). > by(id). > by(label). > by(unfold()) > > Looks a little weird though...maybe? > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:19 AM Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> wrote: > > > Good idea! Also, when I saw the subject of your email, I thought you were > > about to propose something like .with(label), .with(id) or .with(tokens) > - > > I would like that too as valueMap is the only step that takes a boolean > > parameter that changes its behavior. > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018, 2:01 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > valueMap() is a really convenient step: > > > > > > gremlin> g.V().has('person','name','marko').valueMap() > > > ==>[name:[marko],age:[29]] > > > > > > or perhaps more preferably: > > > > > > gremlin> g.V().has('person','name','marko').valueMap('name','age') > > > ==>[name:[marko],age:[29]] > > > > > > but argh - multiproperties ruin everything. so then we're forced into > > > Gremlin acrobatics: > > > > > > gremlin> g.V().has('name','marko'). > > > ......1> valueMap('name','age'). > > > ......2> unfold(). > > > ......3> group(). > > > ......4> by(keys). > > > ......5> by(select(values).unfold()) > > > ==>[name:marko,age:29] > > > > > > or as I usually recommend, use project(): > > > > > > gremlin> > > > > > > > > > g.V().has('person','name','marko').project('name','age').by('name').by('age') > > > ==>[name:marko,age:29] > > > > > > which is fine, but you pretty much have to type a lot more especially > if > > > there are a lot of properties to contend with. What if we were to > > modulate > > > valueMap() with by(Traversal) so that: > > > > > > g.V().has('person','name','marko'). > > > valueMap('name','age'). > > > by(unfold()) > > > > > > and the by() are just applied round-robin on the keys? Thoughts? > > > > > >