just peeking in on this PR - I'll let @jorgebay make the final word on this, but I guess the reason we needed to add this line was so that calls further down that use `options` and not `this.options` will work properly? shouldn't we just consistently use `this.options` rather than try to interchangeably use both as well as alter the state of the `options` parameter?
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1038 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
