> Is there a common design/feature set for connection pool handling that all > gremlin driver variants are aiming for? Or is this more decided on a per > language/variant basis?
It's more the latter. Since C# is in general quite similar to Java and because the Java driver was the first one and is probably still the most advanced one, we often use that driver as kind of a reference for the .NET driver. But on the other hand we also don't copy everything from the Java driver. I especially tried to avoid some of the complexities of the Java driver where I didn't see a need yet to introduce them. So, long story short: The development of the drivers is independent for the different languages, but where it makes sense to copy the Java driver, we do that to make it easier to switch between languages, especially for contributors. @jorgebay Will you have the time to review this again? [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1077 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
