i've external linked to those anchors many times from other sites like StackOverflow, blog posts, the mailing lists, etc. didn't want them to have to come up "dead".
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:17 PM Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > There does have to be some sort of content following the anchor. So maybe > an html comment after each would work. I can try it later. > > But what links are you seeing that need preserved? Something that > references ‘latest’ docs? All the internal links are fully qualified with > the version. > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 17:59 Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > oh hell....that's bad. so there's no way to preserve old links? is there > no > > workaround at all? some sort of hidden text maybe? > > > > [[connecting-via-remotegraph]] > > // comment > > > > [[connecting-via-java]] > > // comment > > > > [[gremlin-java]] > > == Gremlin-Java > > > > ??? > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:23 PM Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > In Asciidoc, you cannot stack multiple anchor Ids. Only the last one > will > > > be used. You will end up with broken links if any of the previous > anchors > > > are referenced. Asciidoc will not warn you or complain. > > > > > > Bad: > > > > > > [[connecting-via-remotegraph]] > > > [[connecting-via-java]] > > > [[gremlin-java]] > > > == Gremlin-Java > > > > > > > > > Good: > > > > > > [[gremlin-java]] > > > == Gremlin-Java > > > > > > > > > Robert Dale > > > > > > -- > Robert Dale >
