[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16866842#comment-16866842
 ] 

stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2245:
---------------------------------------------

so scary, but, yes, this is an area of technical debt that exists. 
unfortunately the {{GremlinExecutor}} did not quite hit the layer of 
abstraction i was hoping to hit when it was first developed. we then developed 
bytecode several years after the fact and sorta wedged it in there. there is a 
fair bit of code/function duplication that could be eradicated across Gremlin 
Server. 

> [Refactor] Consolidate the executor for bytecode & string based client
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2245
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2245
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.2
>            Reporter: Divij Vaidya
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We have two code paths in the server which perform (more or less) the same 
> functions. One is the executor for string based queries and other is the 
> executor for bytecode. This code can be refactored together so that the logic 
> to handle timeout, handle exception during execution, handle exception before 
> execution and others can consolidated. 
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/master/gremlin-groovy/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/groovy/engine/GremlinExecutor.java#L246]
> and
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/master/gremlin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/server/op/traversal/TraversalOpProcessor.java#L333]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to