sorry for all the JIRA noise - mostly just moving "assigned by" fields a
bit. some stuff no one is really looking at right now, so just doing a bit
of issue tracker hygiene. there's still a lot of old issues out there which
could probably be closed, but they hold a few nice ideas that kinda haunt
TP3 so i've left them alone as we've trucked along. anyway, might yet close
a few issues as things we're not going to ever work on, so perhaps a few
more emails may come through to dev yet.

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 2:56 PM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I've published fresh SNAPSHOT artifacts and docs for review:
>
> https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.11-SNAPSHOT/
> https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.5.0-SNAPSHOT/
>
> If you happen to have any time at all to review any of this, please spend
> some time in the Upgrade Documentation for 3.5.0 as that will be the first
> thing folks will be reading when we release:
>
> https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.5.0-SNAPSHOT/upgrade
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 9:10 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> phew - it seems the slow down was related to the surefire plugin. i'd
>> updated that on master to a newer version and it required some additional
>> configuration options to run our stuff properly. once i reverted, to the
>> same version as 3.4-dev the build speeds made more sense. i guess i'm going
>> to keep it there for release. i imagine we'll revisit the upgrade in the
>> future at some point.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:41 PM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been trying to sort out TINKERPOP-2550 with kerberos and recently
>>> haven't been hassled by those sorts of errors in travis where they've been
>>> occurring with some regularity. So that's good. I've also been testing and
>>> re-testing around the deadlock issues I'd alluded to prior to code freeze.
>>> Travis jobs seem much more stable on 3.4-dev, but since I've only just
>>> started seeing master start to shape up the same way, I'd say I still need
>>> to keep testing that branch.
>>>
>>> I'm also noticing that the build on master is almost twice as long as
>>> 3.4-dev. I don't know why and I can't say with certainty when that started
>>> to happen. My benchmarking effort didn't show a slow down with
>>> driver/server operations so that finding is somewhat at odds with the build
>>> itself. There are more tests on master but I didn't think there were
>>> significantly more to make up for this difference. I'll be looking into
>>> this issue further as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 5:47 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another code freeze week and this time a big one for 3.5.0. All PRs of
>>>> a blocking nature were merged so that's good. I'm still finding Travis a
>>>> bit finicky with kerberos even after a fair bit of effort on
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2504
>>>>
>>>> but that's always been an issue so I'm not thinking that a blocker. I
>>>> expect to close that issue and open a new one specific to kerberos unless.
>>>> I'm still examining some issues with:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2550
>>>>
>>>> despite it being closed. Found another interesting deadlock that can
>>>> occur on close where a synchronized method was calling itself in low
>>>> resource environments like travis. I'm going to watch travis for more hangs
>>>> and run more tests this week.If you'd like to help test this, you can run
>>>> the docker build with --cpus=0.9 (smart HadoopMarch idea there) or go to
>>>> the TestClientFactory and set the workerPoolSize on the Cluster in the
>>>> build() method to 1 and then run the build. Or alternatively, just write
>>>> your own little tests with a Cluster you construct with that setting. I'd
>>>> be happy to hear if anyone managed to do the latter actually and if they
>>>> ran to some success or failure and what kind of test they wrote in the
>>>> process. I think the problem at this point tend to generate from
>>>> sessionless requests and open/close situations but any sort of testing is
>>>> helpful.
>>>>
>>>> Other than that, let's focus on testing and documentation review this
>>>> week and then head on to release. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to