> One caveat to that - Florian, I had a bit of trouble sorting through your > dependabot merges. I assume dependabot will just create fresh PRs for you to > merge when we force push this to 3.5-dev? you could just merge them in again?
Yes, that shouldn't be a problem. It looks like you already have a good basis for 3.5-dev with your 3.5-dev-rebuild but just in case it could still help: I have checked out a version of 3.5-dev locally from August 23 that still looks good. It only misses the 3 most recent commits (not counting merge commits). If you want to use it, I pushed it as 3.5-dev-august-23. Otherwise, we can just delete the branch again. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. August 2021 21:52 An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Betreff: Re: branches crossed I've rebuilt the 3.5-dev branch as: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/tree/3.5-dev-rebuild and I'm running the docker tests on it now but a preliminary build worked fine. It should have all the commits that 3.5-dev should have without the ones destined for master only. One caveat to that - Florian, I had a bit of trouble sorting through your dependabot merges. I assume dependabot will just create fresh PRs for you to merge when we force push this to 3.5-dev? you could just merge them in again? I'd like to quickly turn this around and get 3.5-dev operational again, so I will look to replace 3.5-dev with the git history of 3.5-dev-rebuild tomorrow and then do a no-op merge to master (specifically with "git merge 3.5-dev --strategy=ours" - I think that's the best way, if you know something better please let me know). I'd expect to send a quick note to dev to be ready for the change right before I do it and then it will be fixed. I see no reason to keep a backup of 3.5-dev as it's basically just a copy of master at this point. On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:25 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like 3.5-dev is suddenly even with master. No idea how/when that > happened. Trying to figure it out, but if anyone knows what might have > gone wrong, please yell. >