> One caveat to that - Florian, I had a bit of trouble sorting through your 
> dependabot merges. I assume dependabot will just create fresh PRs for you to 
> merge when we force push this to 3.5-dev?
you could just merge them in again?

Yes, that shouldn't be a problem.

It looks like you already have a good basis for 3.5-dev with your 
3.5-dev-rebuild but just in case it could still help: I have checked out a 
version of 3.5-dev locally from August 23 that still looks good. It only misses 
the 3 most recent commits (not counting merge commits). If you want to use it, 
I pushed it as 3.5-dev-august-23. Otherwise, we can just delete the branch 
again.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. August 2021 21:52
An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Betreff: Re: branches crossed

I've rebuilt the 3.5-dev branch as:

https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/tree/3.5-dev-rebuild

and I'm running the docker tests on it now but a preliminary build worked fine. 
It should have all the commits that 3.5-dev should have without the ones 
destined for master only. One caveat to that - Florian, I had a bit of trouble 
sorting through your dependabot merges. I assume dependabot will just create 
fresh PRs for you to merge when we force push this to 3.5-dev?
you could just merge them in again?

I'd like to quickly turn this around and get 3.5-dev operational again, so I 
will look to replace 3.5-dev with the git history of 3.5-dev-rebuild tomorrow 
and then do a no-op merge to master (specifically with "git merge 3.5-dev 
--strategy=ours" - I think that's the best way, if you know something better 
please let me know). I'd expect to send a quick note to dev to be ready for the 
change right before I do it and then it will be fixed. I see no reason to keep 
a backup of 3.5-dev as it's basically just a copy of master at this point.



On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:25 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Looks like 3.5-dev is suddenly even with master. No idea how/when that 
> happened. Trying to figure it out, but if anyone knows what might have 
> gone wrong, please yell.
>

Reply via email to