[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17630438#comment-17630438
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2824:
-------------------------------------------

spmallette commented on code in PR #1843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1843#discussion_r1016670856


##########
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/strategy/finalization/DetachStrategy.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.strategy.finalization;
+
+import org.apache.commons.configuration2.Configuration;
+import org.apache.commons.configuration2.MapConfiguration;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.Traversal;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.TraversalStrategy;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.Traverser;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.step.map.ScalarMapStep;
+import 
org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.step.sideEffect.ProfileSideEffectStep;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.step.util.EmptyStep;
+import 
org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.strategy.AbstractTraversalStrategy;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.util.TraversalHelper;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.structure.util.detached.DetachedFactory;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Optional;
+
+/**
+ * A strategy that manages the properties that will be in the result.
+ *
+ * @author Valentyn Kahamlyk
+ */
+public final class DetachStrategy extends 
AbstractTraversalStrategy<TraversalStrategy.FinalizationStrategy> implements 
TraversalStrategy.FinalizationStrategy {
+
+    private static final DetachStrategy INSTANCE = new 
DetachStrategy(DetachMode.ALL, null);
+    private DetachMode detachMode = DetachMode.ALL;
+    private List<String> properties;
+
+    private DetachStrategy() {}
+
+    private DetachStrategy(final DetachMode detachMode, final List<String> 
properties) {

Review Comment:
   would a `Set` be better than a `List` for the properties? i think it might 
be better to refer to these things as "keys" as "property" tends to denote a 
`Property` object typically in TinkerPop parlance.





> Properties on Elements
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2824
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2824
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dotnet, driver, go, javascript, process, python
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.4
>            Reporter: Valentyn Kahamlyk
>            Assignee: Valentyn Kahamlyk
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.7.0
>
>
> Problem: When a user writes `g.V()` they get back a Vertex object. The 
> problem is that depending on the execution context of the traversal, the 
> result could be quite different, with or without properties.
> Solution: Implement new finalization strategy DetachStrategy(detachMode, 
> properties) where mode is one of ALL, NONE or CUSTOM. `properties` is list of 
> properties name, are taken into account only for CUSTOM mode.
> Discussion thread in dev list: [Proposal to handle properties on response 
> Elements-Apache Mail 
> Archives|https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8rw7ydj7kym8vhtwk50nhbp45ng9986]
> Stephen's thread in dev list: [The Issue of Detachment-Apache Mail 
> Archives|https://lists.apache.org/thread/xltcon4zxnwq4fyw2r2126syyrqm8spy]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to