[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stephen Mallette updated TINKERPOP-2873:
----------------------------------------
    Issue Type: Improvement  (was: New Feature)

> Allow Union of Traversals
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2873
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2873
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: language
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.2
>            Reporter: Martin Häusler
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, it is possible to use the gremlin "union(...)" step as a union 
> based on *traversers*. The union takes each incoming traverser, and clones it 
> for each sub-traversal and feeds it to the sub-traversal as input.
> There is another type of union, which relates more to a SQL "UNION ALL" 
> command. This second type of union is the union of *Traversals*. So we have 
> *independent* traversals with their own start and end steps, and we want to 
> combine them into a single traversal. The outcome of this traversal is the 
> union of the outcome of all sub-traversals.
> One way to achieve this would be to allow "union(...)" step as the initial 
> step for a traversal:
> {code:java}
> g.traversal().union(t1, t2, t3) ...  // traversal continues here
> {code}
> The purpose of this mechanism is:
> * The root traversal after the "union(...)" step has access to all of the 
> labels and side effect keys of the sub-traversals and can operate on them.
> * The root traversal can operate on the resulting traversers and continue to 
> filter them, perform navigation steps, etc.
> Currently, the workaround for this kind of "traversal union" is:
> {code:java}
> g.traversal().inject(0).union(t1, t2, t3) ...  // traversal continues here
> {code}
> Here, we inject a dummy value of 0 into the traversal which only exists to 
> trigger the union step, where it is discarded immediately by all alternatives 
> (which come with their own start steps). This works as intended and also 
> shares side effect keys etc. but is syntactically unpleasant and rather 
> confusing to read.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to