[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17704769#comment-17704769
]
Yang Xia commented on TINKERPOP-2907:
-------------------------------------
Closing this issue for now, as Stephen has provided a resolution. Please feel
free to re-open if needed.
> Throw ExecutionException for property
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2907
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2907
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: driver, server
> Affects Versions: 3.6.2
> Environment: - TinkerGraph Version: 3.6.2
> - Operating system: macOS 13.2.1
> - API/Driver: Java
> Reporter: Zeyang Zhuang
> Priority: Major
>
> I first randomly create a graph. Then when I run the following query:
> `g.V().has('vp4',
> between(0.10558513485092047,0.27458978042693427).and(between(0.4688484640878603,Infinity))).and(__.order().by(desc)).hasNot('vp1')`
> is thrown with an exception. I think this query is syntactically correct,
> but I keep triggering this kind of problem. Can TinkerGraph supports Infinity
> comparison?
> *Expected behavior:*
> No exception should be expected to throw. Or futher messages or prompts
> should be thrown.
> *Actual behavior:*
> A `java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException` is thrown. And I'm not really
> sure whether this problem should happen so I report this. I think it should
> support the Infinity rules.
> ```
> TinkerGraph exception :
> java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.driver.exception.ResponseException: No such
> property: Infinity for class: Script126
> ```
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
