[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Yang Xia updated TINKERPOP-2927:
--------------------------------
    Priority: Critical  (was: Minor)

> Make all Steps extensible and overridable 
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2927
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: driver
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.2
>            Reporter: Oleksandr Porunov
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Related issue (fixed): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2924
>  
> Working on optimization strategies sometimes require replacing steps with 
> extended version of those steps. At this moment not all steps can be extended 
> due to being `final` (like `ProjectStep`, `PropertyKeyStep`, 
> `PropertyValueStep`, `RangeLocalStep`, `SumLocalStep`, and many more). Thus, 
> it requires creating a similar step and duplicate some logic there instead of 
> simply extending a specific step.
>  
> For those steps which are non-final there are sometimes private fields 
> without any getter methods (for example `private CallbackRegistry<Event> 
> callbackRegistry` in `DropStep` is `private`. Thus, the caller needs to use 
> Reflaction API to retrieve it's value).
>  
> In JanusGraph we replace some steps with the extended version of those steps. 
> For example, we completely overwrite `flatMap` step of `PropertiesStep` which 
> is an anti-pattern, but in the case when it's hard to extend specific logic 
> parts such anti-pattern might be a a good solution I guess.
>  
> I think it would make sense to let Graph developers to extend any step and 
> has access to it's fields / utility methods.
> In such case we could do similar with `ProjectStep` and make it query data in 
> parallel (see issue: [https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/issues/3559] ).
>  
> I'm also good not doing it in case anyone can suggest other patterns to 
> follow for those optimizations instead of overwriting logic. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to