[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17778752#comment-17778752
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2978:
-------------------------------------------

vkagamlyk commented on code in PR #2302:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2302#discussion_r1368982131


##########
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/map/TraversalMergeStep.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.step.map;
+
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.Traversal;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.Traverser;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.step.TraversalParent;
+import 
org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.traverser.TraverserRequirement;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.util.ListFunction;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.util.TraversalUtil;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.structure.util.StringFactory;
+import org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.util.iterator.IteratorUtils;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.Iterator;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Objects;
+import java.util.Set;
+
+/**
+ * A map step that returns the merger of the traverser and the provided 
arguments without duplicates. This is commonly
+ * known as a union.
+ */
+public final class TraversalMergeStep<S, E> extends ScalarMapStep<S, E> 
implements TraversalParent, ListFunction {
+    private Traversal.Admin<S, E> valueTraversal;
+    private Object parameterItems;
+    public TraversalMergeStep(final Traversal.Admin traversal, final Object 
values) {
+        super(traversal);
+
+        if (values instanceof Traversal) {
+            valueTraversal = integrateChild(((Traversal<S, E>) 
values).asAdmin());
+        } else {
+            parameterItems = values;
+        }
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public String getStepName() { return "merge"; }
+
+    @Override
+    protected E map(final Traverser.Admin<S> traverser) {
+        S incoming = traverser.get();
+
+        Map mapA = (incoming instanceof Map) ? (Map) incoming : null;
+        if (mapA != null) {
+            final Object mapB = (valueTraversal != null) ? 
TraversalUtil.apply(traverser, valueTraversal) : parameterItems;
+            if (!(mapB instanceof Map)) {
+                throw new IllegalArgumentException(
+                        String.format(
+                                "%s step expected provided argument to 
evaluate to a Map, encountered %s",
+                                getStepName(),
+                                mapB.getClass()));
+            }
+
+            final Map mergedMap = new HashMap(mapA);
+            mergedMap.putAll((Map) mapB);
+            return (E) mergedMap;
+        } else {
+            final Collection listA = convertTraverserToCollection(traverser);
+
+            if (parameterItems instanceof Map) {
+                throw new IllegalArgumentException(getStepName() + " step type 
mismatch: expected argument to be Iterable but got Map");
+            }
+            final Collection listB =
+                    (null != valueTraversal)
+                            ? convertTraversalToCollection(traverser, 
valueTraversal)
+                            : convertArgumentToCollection(parameterItems);
+
+            final Set elements = new HashSet();
+
+            elements.addAll(listA);
+            elements.addAll(listB);
+
+            return (E) elements;
+        }
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public List<Traversal.Admin<S, E>> getLocalChildren() {
+        return (null == valueTraversal) ? Collections.emptyList() : 
Collections.singletonList(valueTraversal);
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public Set<TraverserRequirement> getRequirements() { return 
this.getSelfAndChildRequirements(); }
+
+    @Override
+    public void setTraversal(final Traversal.Admin<?, ?> parentTraversal) {
+        super.setTraversal(parentTraversal);
+        if (valueTraversal != null) { 
this.integrateChild(this.valueTraversal); }
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public TraversalMergeStep<S, E> clone() {
+        final TraversalMergeStep<S, E> clone = (TraversalMergeStep<S, E>) 
super.clone();
+        if (null != this.valueTraversal) {
+            clone.valueTraversal = this.valueTraversal.clone();
+        } else if (this.parameterItems instanceof Map) {

Review Comment:
   Why different handling depends on type of `parameterItems`?





> Add List Manipulation Steps to Gremlin
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2978
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2978
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: language
>            Reporter: Cole Greer
>            Priority: Major
>
> Today Gremlin requires that users fall back to closures to handle many common 
> list manipulation options that users want to do on data in the graph.  This 
> is a problem for many users as many of the providers prevent the use of 
> closures due to the security risks so for these users there is no way to 
> manipulate lists directly.
> A full list of proposed functions and semantics is detailed here: 
> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.7.0/docs/src/dev/future/proposal-3-remove-closures.asciidoc



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to