Hi Ryan, I agree that the addition of these example applications makes the current archetypes redundant. I also agree with Florian’s comment on your PR regarding the .NET templates also becoming redundant due to these changes. I am in favour of removing all the archetypes and templates from the repo once all questions around the new examples are addressed and they are accepted into the project.
Regards, Cole From: Ryan Tan <ryanmt...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 7:10 PM To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org <dev@tinkerpop.apache.org> Subject: [DISCUSS] Removal of gremlin-archetypes with the addition of GLV examples Hi everyone, I've been working on TINKERPOP-2995 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TINKERPOP/issues/TINKERPOP-2995> which introduces sample applications for GLVs, each containing examples for connecting, basic Gremlin, and simple traversals, and it seems that gremlin-archetypes has been made redundant as a result. While these new examples do not extensively cover all the same areas as gremlin-archetypes, I believe they fill a similar niche as an introduction to the project and are more intuitive to find for newer users of Gremlin. Therefore, removing it may be beneficial in alleviating some of the burden of maintainability as it has had issues in the past and occasionally causes actions to fail for unrelated items. Does anyone have any thoughts or concerns regarding this matter? Thanks, Ryan Tan Warning: The sender of this message could not be validated and may not be the actual sender.
