[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17878958#comment-17878958
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-3110:
-------------------------------------------

codecov-commenter commented on PR #2757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2757#issuecomment-2327062224

   ## 
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2757?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 Report
   Attention: Patch coverage is `86.36364%` with `3 lines` in your changes 
missing coverage. Please review.
   > Project coverage is 76.41%. Comparing base 
[(`9b46b67`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/commit/9b46b6777d2fa250e41daacf2fa4554605aff53a?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 to head 
[(`fc6e3ee`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/commit/fc6e3ee30cad3549b49ad9d020db49942da22f95?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
   > Report is 201 commits behind head on 3.7-dev.
   
   | [Files with missing 
lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2757?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 | Patch % | Lines |
   |---|---|---|
   | 
[.../tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/Bytecode.java](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2757?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=gremlin-core%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fapache%2Ftinkerpop%2Fgremlin%2Fprocess%2Ftraversal%2FBytecode.java&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache#diff-Z3JlbWxpbi1jb3JlL3NyYy9tYWluL2phdmEvb3JnL2FwYWNoZS90aW5rZXJwb3AvZ3JlbWxpbi9wcm9jZXNzL3RyYXZlcnNhbC9CeXRlY29kZS5qYXZh)
 | 83.33% | [1 Missing and 1 partial :warning: 
](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2757?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 |
   | 
[...gremlin/process/traversal/util/BytecodeHelper.java](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2757?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=gremlin-core%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fapache%2Ftinkerpop%2Fgremlin%2Fprocess%2Ftraversal%2Futil%2FBytecodeHelper.java&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache#diff-Z3JlbWxpbi1jb3JlL3NyYy9tYWluL2phdmEvb3JnL2FwYWNoZS90aW5rZXJwb3AvZ3JlbWxpbi9wcm9jZXNzL3RyYXZlcnNhbC91dGlsL0J5dGVjb2RlSGVscGVyLmphdmE=)
 | 90.00% | [0 Missing and 1 partial :warning: 
](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2757?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 |
   
   <details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
   
   
   ```diff
   @@              Coverage Diff              @@
   ##             3.7-dev    #2757      +/-   ##
   =============================================
   + Coverage      76.14%   76.41%   +0.27%     
   - Complexity     13152    13203      +51     
   =============================================
     Files           1084     1060      -24     
     Lines          65160    61439    -3721     
     Branches        7285     7315      +30     
   =============================================
   - Hits           49616    46950    -2666     
   + Misses         12839    11973     -866     
   + Partials        2705     2516     -189     
   ```
   
   </details>
   
   [:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by 
Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2757?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
   
   :loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it 
here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
   




> Incorrect Bytecode when multiple options are used in traversal
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-3110
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3110
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Saikiran Boga
>            Priority: Major
>
> When multiple options like with("x",1).with("y",1) are used to build a 
> traversal, the Bytecode building logic when constructing the traversal on the 
> server keeps appending the Bytecode incrementally instead of replacing the 
> previous Bytecode instruction.
> For a query like below:
> {code:java}
> g
> .with('evaluationTimeout',300000L)
> .with('a', 1)
> .with('b', 2)
> .with('c', 3)
> .V(){code}
> The Bytecode attached to traversal looks as:
> {code:java}
> g
> .withStrategies(new 
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.strategy.decoration.OptionsStrategy(evaluationTimeout:
>  300000L))
> .withStrategies(new 
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.strategy.decoration.OptionsStrategy(evaluationTimeout:
>  300000L, a: (int) 1))
> .withStrategies(new 
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.strategy.decoration.OptionsStrategy(evaluationTimeout:
>  300000L, a: (int) 1, b: (int) 2))
> .withStrategies(new 
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.strategy.decoration.OptionsStrategy(evaluationTimeout:
>  300000L, a: (int) 1, b: (int) 2, c: (int) 3))
> .V() {code}
> Instead it should be just single instruction for OptionsStrategy as:
>  
> {code:java}
> g
> .withStrategies(new 
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.process.traversal.strategy.decoration.OptionsStrategy(evaluationTimeout:
>  300000L, a: (int) 1, b: (int) 2, c: (int) 3))
> .V() {code}
>  
> We always build a new OptionsStrategy here and carry over the previous 
> options 
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/master/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/TraversalSource.java#L116-L122]
> as OptionsStrategy itself is immutable and we cannot add new options after 
> creating it.
>  
> We build the traversal strategies set and bytecode here:
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/master/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/TraversalSource.java#L132-L133]
>  
> The traversal strategies set itself is built correctly and we remove 
> duplicates 
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/master/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/util/DefaultTraversalStrategies.java#L42-L50]
>  
> But Bytecode just appends the new strategy as instruction 
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/master/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/Bytecode.java#L82-L83]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to