[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Yang Xia closed TINKERPOP-1311.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Do

Closing given 
[discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread/om2m0phg25s83529p9w0gldmcxz7578h] - 
it can be reopened if there is expectation that there will be active work on 
this item.

> AttachableFactory and its entailments.
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1311
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1311
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: structure
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0-incubating
>            Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez
>            Priority: Major
>
> I think that {{ReferenceXXX}}, {{DetachedXXX}}, and {{StarXXX}} should all 
> implement both {{Attachable}} and have a respective {{AttachableFactory}}.
> With proper interfaces, providers can create their own {{ProviderXXX}} 
> attachables to be used in OLAP and OLTP as they please. For instance, I'm 
> already seeing that I can solve the {{path.by("name")}} problem in OLAP by 
> using {{DetachedXXX}} where appropriate in a traversal. Or, if its 
> {{path.by(outE().count())}}, then {{StarXXX}}. In other words, 
> detaching/attaching should be really flexible, dynamic, and we can come up 
> with all sorts of sweet attachables that are optimized for every nook and 
> cranny case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to