[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17901800#comment-17901800
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2959:
-------------------------------------------
Cole-Greer commented on code in PR #2919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2919#discussion_r1862714040
##########
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/filter/CoinStep.java:
##########
@@ -73,7 +85,7 @@ public String toString() {
@Override
public int hashCode() {
- return super.hashCode() ^ Double.hashCode(this.probability);
+ return super.hashCode() ^ Double.hashCode(this.probability.get());
Review Comment:
Those will not be equivalent as GValue.hashCode() combines the hash of the
name, type, and value. I believe it's best if the equality of CoinStep is based
on the value of the probability, not the name of any parameter.
> Allow the grammar to support parameters
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2959
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: language
> Affects Versions: 3.6.4
> Reporter: Stephen Mallette
> Assignee: Stephen Mallette
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.7.0
>
>
> Allow the grammar to support parameters similar to how the groovy engine does
> like, {{g.inject(x,y,z)}}. Doing this will make it easier for a transition
> away from the groovy engine as a lot of Gremlin in the world today uses
> parameters. The grammar may have to come with some limitations though as
> groovy is wide open in terms of what can be treated as a variable. Probably
> going to keep parameters tied to primitives, collections and tokens/enums
> like {{Order}} and {{Scope}}. Collections themselves will not contain
> parameters and things like a {{Traversal}} or {{P}} cannot be treated as one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
