[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stephen Mallette closed TINKERPOP-3109.
---------------------------------------
    Resolution: Workaround

doc updates:

https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/019b860464e74bc6ece840ab709a474573bbdb7f
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/c4557a657a83c872da1ef6fe25f1c46f15ff3b75

note that TinkerGraph configured with transactions seems to get the rollback 
right for this specific case:

{code}
gremlin> gtx = g.tx().begin()
==>graphtraversalsource[tinkertransactiongraph[vertices:6 edges:6], standard]
gremlin> gtx.V().as('v').sideEffect(outE().drop()).coalesce(bothE(), fail('all 
edges removed'))
fail() Step Triggered
====================================================================================================================
Message  > all edges removed
Traverser> v[1]
  Bulk   > 1
  Sack   > null
  Loops  > {null=0}
  S/E    > {}
Traversal> fail("all edges removed")
Parent   > CoalesceStep 
[V().as("v").sideEffect(__.outE().drop()).coalesce(__.bothE(),__.fail("all 
edges removed"))]
Metadata > {}
====================================================================================================================
gremlin> gtx.E()
==>e[10][4-created->5]
==>e[11][4-created->3]
==>e[12][6-created->3]
gremlin> gtx.tx().rollback()
==>null
gremlin> g.E()
==>e[7][1-knows->2]
==>e[8][1-knows->4]
==>e[9][1-created->3]
==>e[10][4-created->5]
==>e[11][4-created->3]
==>e[12][6-created->3]
{code}

> Writes succeed even when query fail()s
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-3109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3109
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 3.7.2
>            Reporter: Christopher Smith
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This may be a fundamental limitation of the non-transactional design of 
> TinkerGraph, in which case I would request a more detailed writeup on the 
> {{fail()}} step itself.
> I am trying to test a query where if all edges are removed from a vertex, the 
> query should fail (to avoid an orphaned resource):
> {code:java}
> // drop some edges
> .select('v').coalesce(__.in('Manages').limit(1), fail('all edges 
> removed')){code}
> In Neptune, the {{fail()}} step results in a rollback of the entire query so 
> that the edges are not removed. In TinkerGraph, the query still fails (and I 
> get my expected HTTP 409 response), but the graph changes are applied.
> If this is unavoidable (e.g., no ability to roll back state once a {{drop()}} 
> has been executed), then please add a note to the reference documentation for 
> {{fail()}} mentioning that whether changes up to that point persist is 
> implementation-specific.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to