[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrea Child updated TINKERPOP-3194:
------------------------------------
Description:
Using `inject()` in `repeat()` without the `RepeatUnrollStrategy` produces
strange results:
{code:java}
gremlin>
g.withoutStrategies(RepeatUnrollStrategy).inject(0).repeat(inject(0)).times(5)
==>0
==>0
gremlin>
g.withStrategies(RepeatUnrollStrategy).inject(0).repeat(inject(0)).times(5)
==>0
==>0
==>0
==>0
==>0
==>0{code}
In the above example, the expected output is 6 zeroes but actual output is 2
zeroes.
was:
Using `inject()` in `repeat()` without the `RepeatUnrollStrategy` produces
strange results:
```
gremlin>
g.withoutStrategies(RepeatUnrollStrategy).inject(0).repeat(inject(0)).times(5)
==>0
==>0
gremlin>
g.withStrategies(RepeatUnrollStrategy).inject(0).repeat(inject(0)).times(5)
==>0
==>0
==>0
==>0
==>0
==>0
```
In the above example, the expected output is 6 zeroes but actual output is 2
zeroes.
> Inject in repeat produces unintuitive results
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-3194
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3194
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.7.4
> Reporter: Andrea Child
> Priority: Major
>
> Using `inject()` in `repeat()` without the `RepeatUnrollStrategy` produces
> strange results:
> {code:java}
> gremlin>
> g.withoutStrategies(RepeatUnrollStrategy).inject(0).repeat(inject(0)).times(5)
> ==>0
> ==>0
> gremlin>
> g.withStrategies(RepeatUnrollStrategy).inject(0).repeat(inject(0)).times(5)
> ==>0
> ==>0
> ==>0
> ==>0
> ==>0
> ==>0{code}
> In the above example, the expected output is 6 zeroes but actual output is 2
> zeroes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
