[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18089491#comment-18089491
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-3243:
-------------------------------------------
spmallette opened a new pull request, #3463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3463
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3243
Adds an overloaded next(amount) to Traversal that resolves to a
Promise<Array> of up to `amount` result values, bringing gremlin-javascript to
parity with next(n) in the Java, Python, .NET, and Go GLVs.
VOTE +1
> Add next(n) batch iteration to gremlin-javascript
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-3243
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3243
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: driver
> Affects Versions: 3.7.5, 3.8.1
> Reporter: Taylor Riggan
> Priority: Minor
>
> The Java, Python, and .NET GLVs all support `next\(n\)` on Traversal to
> retrieve multiple results at once, but gremlin-javascript only supports
> single-item `next()` returning `\{value, done}`. This creates an API
> inconsistency across GLVs that makes it harder to write portable examples and
> documentation.
> Currently, users must manually collect results in a loop to achieve batch
> iteration. A `next(amount)` method returning a `Promise<Array>` would bring
> gremlin-javascript in line with the other GLVs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
