Whoa -- it has syntax highlighting. HipChat doesn't have that :(. Just /code XXXXXX and it just makes it Courier font.
Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Oct 2, 2015, at 2:21 PM, James Thornton <[email protected]> wrote: > Dropbox open-sourced Zulip last week... > > https://zulip.org > https://github.com/zulip > > HN Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10279961 > > - James > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 for Slack, currently using it. >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:36 PM, pieter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 for slack. >>> >>> On 02/10/2015 19:24, Stephen Mallette wrote: >>>> I think it was Matt Frantz who once recommended Slack. Neo4j has a >>> pretty >>>> successful slack setup for community support. >>>> >>>> Outside of slack, i've heard about this one from time to time: >>>> >>>> https://gitter.im/ >>>> >>>> "Chat for GitHub" - it seems geared toward helping improve >>>> communication/support in open source communities. >>>> >>>> Are there others out there to consider? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Awesome. >>>>> >>>>> Just to be clear. I'm not seeing this as a "vote medium" but more of a >>>>> "hang out with the development team and be able to communicate >> faster." >>> Of >>>>> course, JIRA/tickets/etc. are still the place where "formal >> directions" >>> are >>>>> placed. >>>>> >>>>> I use HipChat and iChat (jabber). HipChat is cool because its a "room" >>>>> where iChat is more "one-on-one." I'm really not hip to chat >> technology >>> so >>>>> if other people are cool with a "chat room" and have ideas on how to >>> form >>>>> it, please speak up. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Marko. >>>>> >>>>> http://markorodriguez.com >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yes, absolutely legal. The "rule" is that decisions should be relayed >>>>> back >>>>>> to the list, for the community to comment on. But off list discussion >>>>>> itself isn't a problem. >>>>>> On Oct 2, 2015 6:33 PM, "Marko Rodriguez" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sitting here going -- "man, wish I could just chat with Matt" to >>>>> talk >>>>>>> about the math-library and this bulking issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If Apache is cool with a public chat room to discuss development >>>>> issues, I >>>>>>> think that could really help me out (and perhaps others?). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It would be important that this chat room doesn't become a >>>>>>> "support@tinkerpop" room where people can post "I'm trying to build >>> an >>>>>>> app, but I get this exception." Not sure how to ensure that besides >>>>> through >>>>>>> social manipulation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anywho, does anyone have experience with "public chat rooms" and is >>> this >>>>>>> legal for an Apache project to do? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts?, >>>>>>> Marko. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://markorodriguez.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Have a good one, >> Jason >> > > > > -- > James Thornton, *http://electricspeed.com <http://electricspeed.com>*
