[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15011138#comment-15011138
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP3-972:
-------------------------------------------

Github user pingtimeout commented on the pull request:

    
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/146#issuecomment-157740699
  
    Thanks for the review.  Indeed I forgot the async version of `close()`.
    
    We could use `CompletableFuture::thenRun(Runnable, Executor)` with the 
common Fork/Join pool to shut down the executor but it may take a while if that 
pool is overwhelmed...
    
    I am trying another implementation where `executor().shutdown()` is called 
[immediately 
after](https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/0feaa8b47de2797e177310cd1ea3bf38d7230420/gremlin-driver/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/driver/Cluster.java#L619)
 the call to `.submit()` returns.  According to the Javadoc of 
`ExecutorService`, it should work:
    
        Initiates an orderly shutdown in which previously submitted tasks are 
executed, but no new tasks will be accepted.
    
    If the build succeeds, I will replace my previous commit with that new 
change.


> Cluster::close does not shut down its executor
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP3-972
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-972
>             Project: TinkerPop 3
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: driver
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.2-incubating
>            Reporter: Pierre Laporte
>            Assignee: stephen mallette
>
> *Context*
> Using the Gremlin driver in a Java application, I can create a {{Cluster}} 
> and a {{Client}} to send some queries to my Gremlin server.
> However, my application never finishes because some Gremlin worker threads 
> stay alive, even though I call {{cluster.close()}}.
> *Cause*
> Those threads are never terminated:
> {code}
> "gremlin-driver-worker-4" #25 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007f824ca4a800 
> nid=0x6a07 waiting on condition [0x0000700001df0000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>       at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>       - parking to wait for  <0x000000076edb9158> (a 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
>       at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1081)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> "gremlin-driver-worker-3" #23 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007f824ca46800 
> nid=0x6803 waiting on condition [0x0000700001ced000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>       at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>       - parking to wait for  <0x000000076edb9158> (a 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
>       at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1081)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> "gremlin-driver-worker-2" #22 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007f824e22f800 
> nid=0x6603 waiting on condition [0x0000700001bea000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>       at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>       - parking to wait for  <0x000000076edb9158> (a 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
>       at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1081)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> "gremlin-driver-worker-1" #21 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007f824e21f000 
> nid=0x6403 waiting on condition [0x0000700001ae7000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>       at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>       - parking to wait for  <0x000000076edb9158> (a 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
>       at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1081)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> *Workaround*
> This code block can solve the issue on the caller side, but relies on 
> reflection and might break any time the implementation changes:
> {code:java}
>     private void fixThreadLeakInGremlinCluster(Cluster cluster) {
>         try {
>             Method executorAccessor = 
> Cluster.class.getDeclaredMethod("executor");
>             executorAccessor.setAccessible(true);
>             ScheduledExecutorService executor = (ScheduledExecutorService) 
> executorAccessor.invoke(cluster);
>             executor.shutdownNow();
>         } catch (Exception e) {
>             e.printStackTrace();
>         }
>     }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to