I haven't fully groked the ramifications, but whatever, I'll deal. +1
Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Jeremy Hanna <[email protected]> wrote: > On the ticket, Gavin asked whether there was consensus among the > committers/PMC on a dev discussion (and link him) and they can do the work. > I’m just Joe Newguy after all so it’s good to make sure it’s something the > project wants to do. Once there is agreement, they can go ahead and make the > change. > >> On Nov 18, 2015, at 3:58 AM, Dylan Millikin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That sounds pretty promising. What would the next step be in that case? >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Jeremy Hanna <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> And to be clear, all external linking with the old project key will work >>> and redirect to the new project key. So if you linked to a TP3 ticket on >>> stack overflow, it will redirect properly to TP. >>> >>>> On Nov 16, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Jeremy Hanna <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I checked into it, and as I mentioned on the infra ticket: >>>> >>>> It looks like the old links will still work if you edit the >>> project key (as well as the project name but the project key is the >>> stickier bit). >>>> >>> https://confluence.atlassian.com/jira/editing-a-project-key-389284652.html >>>> The only thing that appears to be lost is the linking within >>> tickets using the old key in free-text, >>>> such as referencing another ticket in a comment like >>> TINKERPOP3-123 - that will no longer be auto-linked. >>>> However that's a relatively small impact I think. >>>> >>>> I’ll leave it to this group though as to whether you would like an >>> updated key/project that’s more future proof. >>>> >>>>> On Nov 12, 2015, at 6:31 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It's a bit unfortunate that no one seemed to notice that the naming of >>> the >>>>> JIRA project bound us to "3" when we were reviewing the migration from >>>>> github. I've often thought of that over the past year and whether or >>> not >>>>> it would be possible to change it to just TINKERPOP. The problem at >>> this >>>>> point of course is the number of links that point at TINKERPOP3-*. The >>>>> main question I have at the moment is whether or not Apache Infra could >>> do >>>>> anything to help mitigate that and what their recommendations would be >>> in >>>>> that area. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Jeremy Hanna < >>> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If it's no big deal then no worries. I just thought I would look into >>> it >>>>>> in case it would become more difficult to manage later. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Jeremy Hanna <[email protected] >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was curious why the Jira project was named TinkerPop3 instead of >>> just >>>>>> TinkerPop and asked Stephen Mallette about it and it sounded like it >>> was >>>>>> just something that happened on import. So I just thought I would >>> check to >>>>>> see whether it could be changed. I created an INFRA ticket to ask and >>> got >>>>>> the following response on >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10752 from Gavin: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm guessing the reason is because the supplied JSON export file from >>>>>> Github (https://github.com/tinkerpop/tinkerpop3) had TINKERPOP3 as the >>>>>> project name. >>>>>>> We can rename it but would [need] a link to the mailing list >>>>>> discussion and PMC agreement where the name change was discussed. >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I wanted to reach out on this list to find out whether people >>> really >>>>>> care enough to make the change. We can also ask whether a redirect >>> could >>>>>> be put in place for incoming links for the project and for specific >>> tickets. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would just think that if the change is done it would be better to do >>>>>> it sooner than later. Stephen also mentioned after going to TP4 it >>> could >>>>>> be changed to just TinkerPop and the TP3 project could be retired. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In any case, just wanted to bring it up. It’s not a huge deal by any >>>>>> means, but I just thought I would check. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jeremy >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >
