+1 What do you have in mind as a schema abstraction?
On 25/11/2015 19:02, Stephen Mallette wrote: > We don't have a schema abstraction yet in TinkerPop, but graph providers do > support that capability. That capability can cause problems with the > TinkerPop test suite as the test suite sometimes makes assumptions about > types based on the immediate test bases we have in two schemaless graphs of > TinkerGraph and Neo4j - those assumptions tend to lead to problems. > > If we had a new Feature called supportsSchema() we would know if a graph > had that capability and we could write tests with different behaviors for > graph providers who have strong typing systems. > > Anyway, I've created an issue here that relates to this idea: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-992 > > If there are no objections to supportsSchema() in the next 72 hours > (Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 12pm), i'll assume lazy consensus and move > forward with that concept for 3.1.1-incubating. >
