Hi,
I was thinking about this more the other day. For the things I care about, I
think it would be good to have a gremlin-examples/ module that contained:
1. DSL examples -- SocialTraversal/etc.
2. Language compiler -- Java RegEx into Gremlin instructions (e.g.).
3. Build your own implementation examples --- like a stub of a graph
implementation to get people going.
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Jan 13, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jason/Pieter, are you guys saying that you would prefer the publishing of
> an archtype over having gremlin-examples code? or are you saying you would
> have both? also, i spent a very short period of time looking at how to
> publish archtypes and didn't get the answers i wanted in that time - do
> either of you have experience with how that is done to offer a short
> synopsis?
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 I like the Maven archetype idea to encourage folks to build their own
>> projects. Great suggestion, Pieter.
>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 2:03 AM pieter-gmail <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have not looked at Jason's project but publishing some maven
>>> archetypes will be useful. Especially for the more complex setups with
>>> Hadoop, Spark, Neo4j etc.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Pieter
>>>
>>> On 09/01/2016 21:07, Stephen Mallette wrote:
>>>> I was thinking that it might be cool to add a gremlin-examples
>> sub-module
>>>> that contained other sub-modules inside of that. Jason's "example
>>> project"
>>>> gets a lot of references and that's awesome but I'm starting to think
>> we
>>>> should fold it into the core repository (if he wants to do that, of
>>> course,
>>>> or we create a new one).
>>>>
>>>> I think we need to have sub-modules under gremlin-examples as there are
>>>> different types of examples folks might set up. There are ones like
>>>> Jason's that sorta demonstrate how to get going with a basic maven
>>> project,
>>>> then there are ones that might focus on gremlin-driver type
>> applications,
>>>> etc. I don't think we would publish new artifacts or anything for
>> these
>>>> projects but it would be nice to be able to directly reference them in
>>>> documentation and stuff and have them link right to TinkerPop code.
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
