[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15106963#comment-15106963
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1089:
-----------------------------------------------
Yea, I'm trying to get it to work right now and yes, its tricky. Lots of
Comparator wrappers throughout. I think this will take some refactoring
(unfortunately).
> Order.shuffle implementation is too fragile
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1089
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2-incubating
> Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
> Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
> Fix For: 3.1.1-incubating
>
>
> {code}
> __((1..100).toList()).order(local).by(shuffle)
> {code}
> Try that query often enough and it will fail. You can increase the likeliness
> of a failure by increasing the size of the list. An explanation of why that
> happens is given here:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19325256/java-lang-illegalargumentexception-comparison-method-violates-its-general-contr
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
