[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15291986#comment-15291986
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1088:
-------------------------------------------

Github user pluradj commented on the pull request:

    
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/313#issuecomment-220426912
  
    inspected the code, ran `mvn clean install` cleanly, looks good to me
    
    VOTE: +1


> Preserve Cardinality in Subgraph
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1088
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1088
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0-incubating
>            Reporter: stephen mallette
>
> Originally reported here:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/aureliusgraphs/qKvGZOWpNtY/ivd6qc_iAAAJ
> {quote}
> I found the cardinality of properties are not preserved in the subgraph 
> generated by Gremlin 'Subgraph Step' (i.e. subgraph('sub').cap('sub')).
> To be specific, in my case, I have several property keys with 'LIST' 
> cardinality (e.g. propertyKey: created)
> so that there can be multiple properties for those keys.
> e.g.
> gremlin> v.properties()
> =>vp[created->true]
> =>vp[created->false]
> =>vp[created->true]
> (properties also have nested properties so they are not just simple 
> duplication of the same information)
>  
> However, when I generated subgraph from this graph,
> only one of the properties using the same key is copied to the corresponding 
> vertex in the subgraph.
> {quote}
> I think this can be fixed by explicitly using:
> {code}
> public <V> VertexProperty<V> property(final VertexProperty.Cardinality 
> cardinality, final String key, final V value, final Object... keyValues);
> {code}
> Currently the cardinality check is occurring by default but against the 
> target graph and not the source graph (so you get the wrong cardinality).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to