DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38200 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-09 18:21 ------- @ Jess Holle: > isapi_redirect.dll seems to be the stepchild no one wants. yes, I got that feeling too. poor kid. > Personally, I'd love it if my customers would just drop IIS and use > Apache (which we bundle), but some of them are rather stubborn on > this point... well, Apache has advantages, IIS other. I work with both and IIS6 is realy was better then the versions before. Hard to say which is better. But we do professional IT services, so we serve whatever the paying customer demands. If it's ASP or similar combined with Java, its IIS. If plain Java, Apache & Tomcat is the way. @ Mladen Turk: Is that really so? Where is that documented? We searched for quite some time. We spend many weeks developing and bugfixing the JK2 after it was discontinued because we thought we couldn't use JK1. If that Syntax realy works as expected, please add it to some docu and the sample "uriworkermap.properties". That would surely help some people out there. Everyone who depends on doing Microsoft stuff in ASP together with the power of Java in webapps need a IIS- TomCat combination. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
