Could you please remove us from the distribution list? Final Draft Support.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:36 AM To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34107] - session already invalidated before valueUnbound() called DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG* RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34107>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND* INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34107 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 19:35 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Well re-reading the spec, it finally seems that this the way the 2.4 servlet > > is interpreted, but honestly I don't get the interest of it. > Don't worry, I don't see it either. That's fun, I've since found a lot of threads about it : http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994 http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/CACHE-229 Someone even told to complain to [EMAIL PROTECTED] , and apparently "they" kept it in 2.4 and even in 2.5. Do you think it may change anything to complain ? Cause I really agree with developers taking part of the discussion, this "simple" change will break a lot of framework, and I really really don't get the interest of the sessionListener anymore :)))))) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
