DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10527>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10527





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-26 13:16 -------
Created an attachment (id=18354)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18354&action=view)
Tomcat thread hung on handshake

Server.xml 
<Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector" port="8443"
minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" enableLookups="true" acceptCount="100"
debug="0" scheme="https" secure="true" useURIValidationHack="false"
disableUploadTimeout="true">
                        <Factory
className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteServerSocketFactory"
clientAuth="false"
keystoreFile="/omcsw/27.0.2.8.00/lib/3pt/bes/var/domains/base/configurations/EMF/mos/presentation/Client_iEMS/appl/iemsKeystore"
keystorePass="lucent" protocol="TLS"/>
                </Connector>

We found that this is happening in our setup here. All the connections were
fine and then after some time the tomcat was slow in responding and then it
stopped responding. We believe it is because our maxProcessors was set to 75
and we can see there were 74 threads on handshake running. So we understand the
server slowness could be of high number of threads but what we do not
understand is why the threads are performing socket read and why there is no
time out. 

If it is not a tomcat problem any clue on what client configuration could be
wrong will be helpful.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to