Am 28. Oktober 2015 23:42:08 MEZ, schrieb Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>All,
>
>Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
>address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
>forward for some parts of the code.
>
>RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty much instantly.
>However, RTC also slowed us down.
>
>The development of 7.0.x started as CTR with a possibility of switching
>to RTC if necessary. It never was. We chose not to switch 7.0.x to RTC
>because the community issues that made RTC necessary had been solved
>and
>RTC added unnecessary overhead and delay. 8.0.x and now 9.0.x
>progressed
>the same way. Today, only 6.0.x is RTC.
>
>I believe the use of RTC for 6.0.x is causing more harm than good.
>There
>are fixes I don't propose for backport to 6.0.x because of the extra
>hassle RTC introduces. I suspect others take a similar approach judging
>on the number of fixes that don't make it back to 6.0.x.
>
>I would therefore like to propose that we switch the 6.0.x release
>branch from RTC to CTR and am therefore calling a VOTE to make this
>change.
>
>[ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
>[x] Switch 6.0.x to CTR

Felix

>
>Thanks,
>
>Mark
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to