2015-11-04 9:47 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > On 04/11/2015 06:28, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > So you only want the views of the male committers? > > > Would it be possible to add to tomcat codebase a way to register custom > > websocket lifecycle listeners for technical integration. For instance in > > TomEE we would need a clean way to listen for close() or timeout() > without > > modifying the user code side if possible. > > Why? What is the use case? > > Also, there is no timeout() method but there is an error() method. There > is no clear way to differentiate between timeout and any other errors. > > > wdyt? > > Looking at trunk, it appears to be doable with some refactoring but > there would be a (probably small) performance impact. It depends on the > justification. > > Maybe it could be the usual integration thing, for example at the moment the endpoint instances are not going through the InstanceManager. Not sure if that would be enough for him. Obviously a listener system would be much more annoying (configuration needed, etc ...).
Rémy
