On 27/06/2016 16:27, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > As part of a university projects, two students from the University of > Neuchatel have worked on OpenSSL support without APR, effectively producing > a JNI wrapper for OpenSSL. > > It works well according to my testing and is pretty much as expected (the > JNI interfaces are now much more limited in scope), but realistically it is > useful only if there is still a plan to remove the APR connector. If not, > the amount of native code that needs to be maintained would remain the same. > > The experimental code is located here: > https://github.com/jocelynthode/tomcat-native2/tree/TCN2_UNDERCAT > [If trying it, be careful about the hacking of the JNI interfaces JAR, the > readme must be followed] > > Comments ?
Is the performance any different from NIO[2] + tc-native 1.2 + OpenSSL? If I recall correctly, when I asked previously you said APR/native generally had better performance. If the performance was comparable with APR/native I'd have no objection to dropping APR/native. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
