DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40111>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40111 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-08 11:34 ------- I don't think I mentioned static files as a use case. I'm thinking of dynamically generated pages containing product info pertaining to the client request. As in the example I quoted, the shopping cart info is stored in the session object, and in the meantime I search the catalog for more products. I am not familiar with Tomcat's internals so I cannot imagine why it is not trivial to access the session object (isn't it just in some hashtable with the session ID being the key? :)), but could you elaborate a bit more on why it is best not to do it? If I add a simple req.getSession() in a filter as work-around, Tomcat will do the same operation. Is there something particular that I need to worry about/pay attention to? > You have a wide variety of easy workarounds (a valve, a filter, etc). A filter should be easy to implement. But I would still like to look into that setting to enable the Tomcat 4 behaviour you mentioned. Then we would be able to help all our customers who might run into the same issue in the future without having to modify their applications, with all the hassle that brings.. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
