https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60645
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |PatchAvailable --- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> --- (In reply to baier from comment #4) > But why would you want to keep both the original StatementFinalizer class > and the thread-safe StatementFinalizer class? Synchronization is not necessary for most users, so they don't need to pay the penalty. Yes, uncontested locks are fairly inexpensive, but when they aren't needed at all, they can be completely eliminated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
