[X] I'm for that proposal [ ] I'm against that proposal [ ] I don't care
Filip Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi all, I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider as very important. It's probably the first vote ever done for the commited code, but the reasons are known for the folks reading tomcat dev list. The things we have right now for dealing with Keep-Alive is dependent only on the soTimeout. I propose that we split that to the real soTimeout which is the timeout between two consecutive read() on http request and the additional keepAliveTimeout that will be used for determining the timeout between two requests. Few reason why we should need those timeouts separately configured is: 1. Why not, if its possible without breaking current config ? 2. If the timeout between two request is lower then soTimeout it will allow to have much higher number of slow clients 3. If the timeout between two requests is higher then soTimeout it will allow to deal with slow clients sending one byte at the the time with the unacceptable rate. So, I'll just throw a vote here: [ ] I'm for that proposal [ ] I'm against that proposal [ ] I don't care Of course, there is always an option to have an veto. As many of you already know, the code itself was already in the SVN, but it was reverted. Regards, Mladen. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
