https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60963
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Meyer <tho...@m3y3r.de> --- Regarding ZipInputStreamWithPosition: I think you found the ugly part of this patch. I guess your suggestion wouldn't work, because ZipInputStream will construct itself with a new PushBackInputstream and the provided input stream as decorated object. Passing the input stream as you suggest would result in a PushBackInputStream with an PushBackInputStreamWithPosition as decorated object, which is wrong for our intention here. By setting the decorated object after the super constructor has finished we replace the PushbsckInputStream with our implementation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org