DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40967>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40967


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-11-14 11:07 -------
The calculation in this patch is exactly what IIS calculates - e.g. check for
PoolThreadLimit in the registry, and calculate it as MIN(2*MB, 256) otherwise.
(This is described clearly in the linked technet article, and repeated
throughout the IIS docs, so it's by no means guesswork).

e.g. almost every IIS on a server in the world has 256 threads per process.
Setting the default to 250 will still leave a small window where the connection
pool can be overloaded by the web server.

I'd be fine with assuming that every server OS we'll encounter has a minimum of
128MB RAM, and hard coding the 256 as the default for server OSes (with the
registry check for override). I can modify the patch to do that if you agree.
Like you say, as long as high rather than low, it just won't use the extra 
slots.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to