On 03/09/18 16:13, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/09/18 14:47, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/18 11:40, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:19 PM Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> As the start of September is here I'm planning to tag 9.0.x (and 8.5.x) >>>>> shortly and roll the next monthly release. >>>>> >>>>> I've a couple of things I want to look at first so I'll probably be >>>>> tagging in the next day or two. >>>>> >>>>> What is the view on BZ 62667 (the rewrite issue). Is that a bug or an >>>>> enhancement request? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's a bug (I didn't know it was supposed to be possible :) ). I don't >>> know >>>> exactly what level of recursion is actually allowed either. I'm working >>> on >>>> it (assuming it's the simplest case) but I'm not sure it's going to be >>> done >>>> tomorrow. >>> >>> Ack. I can hold off the tag for a day or two if that helps. >>> >> >> The fix I had in the works went well. I don't think there are other places >> that need recursion in rewrite. > > Great news. Tx.
Just an updated. I'm almost ready to tag but I'm seeing failures with the http2.TestAsyncFlush on both Windows and OSX. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
