Rainer Jung wrote:

If you think you can do that in a simple way, then fine.
But if it would require a lots of changes, then I think
we should go with the more powerful solution as part
of 1.3 branch, by using shared memory, web interface, etc.

I just don't think that this is so important if you
still cannot manage it via jkstatus.

Yes, it is simple.

OK then. Knock yourself out :)

Regards,
Mladen.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to