Rainer Jung wrote:
If you think you can do that in a simple way, then fine.
But if it would require a lots of changes, then I think
we should go with the more powerful solution as part
of 1.3 branch, by using shared memory, web interface, etc.
I just don't think that this is so important if you
still cannot manage it via jkstatus.
Yes, it is simple.
OK then. Knock yourself out :)
Regards,
Mladen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]