On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:16 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 to move forward even if jakarta is not yet adopted (there is a single
> time direction - at least at our scale ;))
> -0 to break all clones and related toolings/automotion for hypothetical
> reasons, didn't pay in all projects which did AFAIK
>

Same vote from me!


>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mar. 18 mai 2021 à 14:13, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> > Le 2021-05-18 14:10, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> >
> > >> Comments?
> > >
> > > I don't think the 7.0.x branch should be removed, there is no harm
> > > keeping it.
> > >
> > > As for the master->main change I think that's a waste of time for all
> > > of us. i don't buy the argument that "master" is offensive, but by
> > > moving awa
> >
> > Grr message sent too quickly, sorry.
> >
> > I don't want to reopen the debate, please ignore my comment.
> >
> > Emmanuel Bourg
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to