Mark Thomas wrote: > Yoav Shapira wrote: >> On 3/25/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Since tc6 is a single component, there is no need to provide such a >>> directory. >> I wonder if we should still have current/tc6 for consistency. > > -0. I can see the benefit of consistency but I don't like the idea > because: > - apart from offering consistency, it serves no useful purpose > - if someone tags the external by mistake the tag will be useless
The day that current-current becomes a stable-current (e.g. 6.0 gels, and the next effort will become 6.1, 6.5, 7.0) - actually from the day its released, doesn't it make sense to start directing maintainers to the constant (tc6.0) tag so that current-current can progress? Otherwise, if you wait from the point that 6.1, 7.0 actually begins, instead of the timeframe 6.0 goes into stabilization, the change seems to become exponentially more disruptive when it comes to pass :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
