On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 10:17 +0200, Henri Gomez wrote: > 2007/4/24, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2007/4/24, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The flag is about the response body. We send the response back via a > > > webserver specific method. It's ws_write() ind mod_jk.c. > > > > > > ws_write() calls e.g. ap_rwrite() which should in my opinion set > > > sent_bodyct. I'm careful about that, because I don't fully understand > > > the filter architecture involved.
The ap_http_header_filter sets the sent_bodyct. If I get it right ap_http_header_filter is called by ap_pass_brigade that is called by ap_rwrite in ws_write() In 1.3 it is set in ap_send_http_header() that we call in mod_jk.c (ws_start_response). > > > > > > But ws_write() also contains iSeries specific code. Maybe some of those > > > methods fail. You can log p->r->sent_bodyct inside ws_write and also add > > > some debug log to find out, if it stopps prematurely. Especially > > > ap_change_response_body_xlate() does not seem to be part of standard > > > apache code. No idea, if that has an interaction bug with filters. > > > > No more, we're is AS400_UTF8 mode so the ws_write in i5/OS and Linux > > is the same... > > > > Did you heard about problem with sent_bodyct problem on others platform ? > > BTW, what about the BZ 41563 > (http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=117089564901077&w=2) and proposed > patch ? +1 to apply it. Cheers Jean-Frederic > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
